Jones, M., &
Morrison-Saunders, A. (2017). Understanding the long-term influence of EIA on
organisational learning and transformation. Environmental Impact
Assessment Review, 64, 131–138.
For library access / research help in a similar topic: anyangoceline19@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
This research is an attempt to verify the notion postulated by Robert Bartlett and Lynton Caldwell that the full
benefits of environmental impact assessment (EIA) would take decades to be realized.While EIA is intended to
directly influence decision-making regarding new development proposals, the process is also expected to lead
to organisational learning and transformation over time. Our aimwas to examine the influence of EIA on a single
Western Australian proponent with sustained experience in the process to understand how EIA is used within
the organisation and to seek evidence of transformation of the organisation's purpose andmission. The research
reviewed literature in order to identify key influences of EIA on organisations, along with semi-structured staff
interviews and document analysis for the case study organisation. Ascertaining causality that involvement in
EIA processes influences or effects organisational learning and transformation is a challenge in the face of
other societal events. Document analysis and interviewee data indicates that the action-forcing nature of EIA
did influence proponent behavior through the creation of internal processes seeking to ensure robust design of
new projects that would satisfy environmental protection expectations, without the need to trigger formal EIA.
Evidence of EIA values and thinking were apparent within internal documentation, including the evolving mission
statement. Our research indicates that participation in the EIA process can positively influence organisational
learning and transformation by guiding internal change for decision-making.
REFERENCES
Annandale, D., Taplin, R., 2003. Is environmental impact assessment regulation a ‘burden’
to private firms? Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 23 (3):383–397. http://dx.doi.org/10.
1016/S0195-9255(03)00002-7.
Argote, L., 2011. Organizational learning research: past, present and future. Manag. Learn.
42 (4), 439–446.
Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., 2011. Organizational learning: from experience to knowledge.
Organ. Sci. 22 (5), 1123–1137.
Argyris, C., Schön, D.A., 1996. Organizational learning. 2. Theory, method, and practice.
Addison-Wesley.
Arts, J., Caldwell, P., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2001. Environmental impact assessment follow-
up: good practice and future directions—findings from a workshop at the IAIA
2000 conference. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 19 (3), 175–185.
Bailey, J., 1997. Environmental impact assessment and management: an underexplored
relationship. Environ. Manag. 21 (3):317–327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/
s002679900032.
Bailey, J.M., Saunders, A.N., 1988. Ongoing environmental impact assessment as a force for
change. Proj. Appraisal 3 (1):37–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02688867.1988.
9726652.
Bailey, J., Hobbs, V., Saunders, A., 1992. Environmental auditing: artificial waterway developments
in Western Australia. J. Environ. Manag. 34 (1), 1–13.
Bartlett, R.V., 1990. Ecological reason in administration: environmental impact assessment
and administrative theory. Managing Leviathan: Environmental Politics and
the Administrative State, pp. 81–96.
Bartlett, R.V., 1997. The rationality and logic of NEPA revisited. In: Clark, R.A.C., L (Eds.),
Environmental Policy and NEPA: Past, Present and Future. St Lucie Press, Boca
Raton, pp. 51–60.
Bartlett, R.V., Kurian, P.A., 1999. The theory of environmental impact assessment: implicit
models of policy making. Policy Polit. 27 (4), 415–433.
Bloomberg, L.D., Volpe, M., 2008. Completing Your Qualitative Dissertation: A Roadmap
From Beginning to End. SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA.
Boggs, J.P., 1993. Procedural vs. substantive in the NEPA law: cutting the Gordian knot.
Environ. Prof. 15 (1) (United States).
Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2013. Better Learning. In: Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders,
A., Howitt, R. (Eds.), Sustainability Assessment Pluralism, Practice and Progress,
Routledge, pp. 216–230.
Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders, A., Stoeglehner, G., 2013. Designing an effective sustainability
assessment process. In: Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders, A., Howitt, R. (Eds.), Sustainability
Assessment Pluralism, Practice and Progress, Routledge, pp. 231–244.
Braun, S., Wesche, J.S., Frey, D., Weisweiler, S., Peus, C., 2012. Effectiveness of mission
statements in organizations–a review. J. Manag. Organ. 18 (04), 430–444.
Caldwell, L.K., 1984. International environmental policy. Emergence and Dimensions.
Duke University Press.
Campbell, A., 1997. Mission statements. Long Range Plan. 30 (6):931–932. http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)00084-8.
Cashmore,M., 2004. The role of science in environmental impact assessment: process and
procedure versus purpose in the development of theory. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev.
24 (4):403–426. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2003.12.002.
Cashmore, M., Gwilliam, R., Morgan, R., Cobb, D., Bond, A., 2004. The interminable issue of
effectiveness: substantive purposes, outcomes and research challenges in the advancement
of environmental impact assessment theory. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal
22 (4), 295–310.
Cashmore, M., Bond, A., Cobb, D., 2008. The role and functioning of environmental assessment:
theoretical reflections upon an empirical investigation of causation. J. Environ.
Manag. 88 (4), 1233–1248.
Dahlitz, V., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2015. Assessing the utility of environmental factors
and objectives in environmental impact assessment practice:Western Australian insights.
Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 33 (2), 142–147.
Diduck, A.P., Pratap, D., Sinclair, A.J., Deane, S., 2013. Perceptions of impacts, public participation,
and learning in the planning, assessment and mitigation of two hydroelectric
projects in Uttarkhand, India. Land Use Policy 33, 170182.
Dreyfus, D.A., Ingram, H.M., 1976. National environmental policy act: a view of intent and
practice. Nat. Resour. J. 16, 243.
Enríquez-de-Salamanca, Á., 2016. Project splitting in environmental impact assessment.
Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 34 (2), 152–159.
Fairfax, S.K., 1978. A disaster in the environmentalmovement. Science 199 (4330), 743–748.
Fitzpatrick, P., 2006. In it together: organizational learning through participation in environmental
assessment. J. Environ. Assess. Policy. Manage. 8 (02), 157–182.
Gazzola, P., Jha-Thakur, U., Kidd, S., Peel, D., Fischer, T., 2011. Enhancing environmental
appraisal effectiveness: towards an understanding of internal context conditions in
organisational learning. Plann. Theory Pract. 12 (2), 183–204.
Glasson, J., Therivel, R., Weston, J., Wilson, E., Frost, R., 1997. EIA-learning from experience:
changes in the quality of environmental impact statements for UK planning
projects. J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 40 (4), 451–464.
Goh, S., Richards, G., 1997. Benchmarking the learning capability of organizations. Eur.
Manag. J. 15 (5):575–583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00036-4.
Government Gazette, 2012. Environmental Protection Act 1986 (WA) Environmental impact
assessment (part IV divisions 1 and 2) administrative procedures 2012. (No.223:
5939–5959). Retrieved from:. http://www.epa.wa.gov.au/EIA/assessdev/Pages/
EIAAdminitrativeProcedures.aspx.
Gunningham, N., Grabosky, P.N., Sinclair, D., 1998. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental
Policy (Vol. Oxford Socio-legal Studies). Clarendon Press. Oxford University
Press, Oxford New York.
Gwimbi, P., Nhamo, G., 2016. Effectiveness of Environmental Impact Assessment followup
as a tool for environmental management: lessons and insights from platinum
mines along the Great Dyke of Zimbabwe. Environ. Earth Sci. 75 (7):1–17. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5219-4.
Hay, I., 2012. Communicating in Geography and the Environmental Sciences. fourth ed.
Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, Australia.
Hayes, N., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2007. The effectiveness of environmental offsets in EIA
– practitioner perspectives from Western Australia. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 25
(3), 209–218.
Hollick, M., 1986. Environmental impact assessment: an international evaluation. Environ.
Manag. 10 (2), 157–178.
Jay, S., Jones, C., Slinn, P., Wood, C., 2007. Environmental impact assessment: retrospect
and prospect. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 27 (4):287–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.
1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001.
Jha-Thakur, U., Gazzola, P., Peel, D., Fischer, T.B., Kidd, S., 2009. Effectiveness of strategic
environmental assessment-the significance of learning. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal
27 (2), 133–144.
Jenkins, B., Annandale, D., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2003. The evolution of a sustainability
assessment strategy for Western Australia. Environmental and Planning Law Journal
20 (1), 56–65.
Jones, M., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2016. Making sense of significance in environmental
impact assessment. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 34 (1), 87–93.
Keysar, E., Steinemann, A., 2002. Integrating environmental impact assessmentwithmaster
planning: lessons fromthe US Army. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 22 (6):583–609.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(02)00035-5.
Kidd, S., Fischer, T.B., 2007. Towards sustainability: is integrated appraisal a step in the
right direction? Eviron. Plann. C. Gov. Policy 25 (2), 233–249.
Kim, D.H., 1993. The link between individual and organizational learning. The Strategic
Management of Intellectual Capital. 41.
Lawrence, D.P., 2007. Impact significance determination—back to basics. Environ. Impact
Assess. Rev. 27 (8):755–769. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.02.011.
Martin, L., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2015. Determining the value and influence of informal
strategic advice for environmental impact assessment: Western Australian perspectives.
Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 33 (4), 265–277.
Middle, G., Middle, I., 2010. A review of the use of environmental offset as a policy mechanism
in the environmental impact assessment process (EIA) in Western Australia.
Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 28 (4), 313–322.
Morgan, R.K., 2012. Environmental impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assess.
Proj. Appraisal 30 (1), 5–14.
Morrison-Saunders, A., 1996. Environmental impact assessment as a tool for ongoing environmental
management. Proj. Appraisal 11 (2), 95–104.
Morrison-Saunders, A., 1998. The Effect of Public Pressure During Environmental Impact
Assessment on Environmental Management Outcomes. Presented at: IAIA'98 Sustainability
and the Role of Impact Assessment in the Global Economy. 19–24 April
1998. The Convention Centre Christchurch, New Zealand available:. http://
researchrepository.murdoch.edu.au/id/eprint/2444/.
Morrison-Saunders, A., Bailey, J., 1999. Exploring the EIA/environmental management relationship.
Environ. Manag. 24 (3), 281–295.
Morrison-Saunders, A., Bailey, M., 2009. Appraising the role of relationships between regulators
and consultants for effective EIA. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 29 (5),
284–294.
Morrison-Saunders, A., Bond, A., Pope, J., Retief, F., 2015. Demonstrating the benefits of
impact assessment for proponents. Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 33 (2), 108–115.
Pope, J., Grace, W., 2006. Sustainability assessment in context: Issues of process, policy
and governance. J. Environ. Assess. Policy. Manage. 8 (03), 373–398.
Sadler, B., 1996. Environmental Assessment in a Changing World. Evaluating Practice to
Improve Performance-final Report.
Sánchez, L.E., André, P., 2013. Knowledge management in environmental impact assessment
agencies: a study in Québec, Canada. J. Environ. Assess. Policy and Manage.
15 (3), 1350015.
Sánchez, L.E.,Mitchell, R., 2017. Conceptualizing impact assessment as a learning process.
Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 62:195–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.06.
001.
Sánchez, L.E., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2011. Learning about knowledge management for
improving environmental impact assessment in a government agency: The Western
Australian experience. J. Environ. Manag. 92 (9):2260–2271. http://dx.doi.org/10.
1016/j.jenvman.2011.04.010.
Sánchez-Triana, E., Ortolano, L., 2001. Organizational learning and environmental impact
assessment at Colombia's Cauca Valley Corporation. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 21
(3):223–239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00074-9.
Simonsen, J., 1994. In: Simon, Herbert A. (Ed.), Administrative Behavior. How Organizations
Can be Understood in Terms of Decision Processes. Roskilde University available
at: http://jespersimonsen.dk/Downloads/Simon-introduction. pdf (accessed October
2014).
Sinclair, A.J., Diduck, A., Fitzpatrick, P., 2008. Conceptualizing learning for sustainability
through environmental assessment: critical reflections on 15 years of research. Environ.
Impact Assess. Rev. 28 (7):415–428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2007.11.
001.
Sippe, R., 1999. Criteria and standards for assessing significant impact. Handbook of environmental
impact assessment. 1, pp. 74–92.
Stake, R.E., 2010. Qualitative research: Studying how things work Guilford Press.
Waldeck, S., Morrison-Saunders, A., Annandale, D., 2003. Effectiveness of non-legal EIA
guidance from the perspective of consultants in Western Australia. Impact Assess.
Proj. Appraisal 21 (3), 251–256.
Wang, C., Ahmed, P., 2003. Organisational learning: a critical review. Learn. Organ. 10 (1):
8–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09696470310457469.
Water Corporation, 2016. Water Corporation, 2016 Annual Report. Retrieved from.
https://www.watercorporation.com.au/about-us/our-performance/annual-report.
Weston, J., 2000. EIA, decision-making theory and screening and scoping in UK practice.
J. Environ. Plan. Manag. 43 (2), 185–203.
Weston, J., 2011. Screening for environmental impact assessment projects in England:
what screening? Impact Assess. Proj. Appraisal 29 (2), 90–98.
Wilson, V., 2012. Research methods: interviews Evidence. Evid Based Libr. Inf. Pract. 7 (2),
96–98.
Winter, S.G., 2000. The satisficing principle in capability learning. Strateg. Manag. J. 21
(10−11), 981–996.
No comments:
Post a Comment