1.0 Introduction
2.0 PESTEL Market Analysis
2.2 Economic.
T&T is a hugely significant economic contributor in the European economy. The
industry employs between 12 and 14 million people across Europe and represents
over 5% of total EU GDP (European Commission, 2013b). The Global Financial
Crisis (GFC) during 2008 and the current Euro crisis have taken their toll on
the T&T industry (Alegre, Mateo and Pou, 2013; Viardot, 2011). However,
there are some signs of resilience and recovery. For example, 5 million more
arrivals have been recorded in 2011 compared with 2010 (European Commission,
2013a).
2.3 Social.
The social aspect is important in the T&T industry. For example, the
general economic down turn creating unemployment affects people ability to
partake in tourism activities (Alegre, Mateo and Pou, 2013). This is consistent
with Smeral (2009) who argue
that financial and economic crisis affects tourism demand. Another effect is
that people who are employed in the industry are subject to the changeable
nature of this sector. This is particularly true in popular travel destinations
when conditions such as environmental change or health and safety or economic issues
keep tourists away (Mazilu, Avram and Ispas, 2011; Scott, 2011).
2.4
Technological. Technology is also a major factor in the development of the
T&T industry. Consumers can now buy their tickets or hotel booking via
internet without leaving their house and seeing a travel agent thus giving them
a lot of buyer power (Berne, Garcia-Gonzalez and Migica, 2012). This has also a
huge impact on how T&T companies such as tour operators do their business.
Online buying and selling of products is now part and parcel among tour
operators and travel agents (Rosselló and Riera, 2012; Viardot, 2011). The internet as a source
of information and marketing tool also represents a significant cost redactor (Boffa
and Succurro, 2012).
2.5 Environmental.
The environment and environmental change is perhaps one of the most important
factors in the T&T industry as many destinations rely on the sustainability
of their local natural environment. Climate change, for example, is a highly
topical issue in tourism and destination management (Dwyer et al., 2009) and
could have adverse effects on these destinations and associated businesses
(Stradas, 2010). Individual businesses are recognizing the importance
addressing this issue and are adopting environmental policies to increase the
sustainability of their business (Bohdanowicz, Zientara and Novotna, 2011).
2.6 Legal.
Legislation pertaining to the international T&T industry has a wide ranging
scope and could include labour laws, taxation, insurance, general business
compliance and environmental laws. All of these have an impact on business in
the sector. Environmental laws are important for reasons of environmental
protection and responsible business practices and behavior of visitors.
Although many environmental laws are already in place researchers have been
questioning their effectiveness and are calling for a tightening of such
policies and legislations (Scott and Becken, 2010). An unchecked and
unlegislated greenhouse gas emission will lead to environmental problems that
cause a significant increase of costs to tour operators due to falling revenues
in this industry (European Commission, 2010).
3.0 Five Forces Analysis
3.1 Competition.
The T&T industry tends to be highly competitive with many tour operators
active as a global population has become increasingly mobile and affluent.
There are many small niche operators specializing in particular type areas such
as business travel, nature travel, mountaineering, bird watching, etc. However,
on the whole the industry is dominated by a few large operators, particularly
TUI and Thomas Cook obtaining a combined European market share of 20.5%
(Viardot, 2011). These two companies have grown through aggressive merger and
acquisition strategies. Economies of scale has made pricing a competitive tool
for these companies. However, lower priced competitors from outside Europe pose
a growing threat (European Commission, 2013b). Globally the threat is high.
3.2 Threat
of Entry. TUI and Thomas Cook are by far the largest competitors in Europe and
both companies hold substantial assets that give them a competitive advantage.
Such assets include hotels, cruise ships, airplanes and in addition have a vast
network of strategic partners in all sub-sectors of the T&T industry
(Viardot, 2011). To match this requires substantial initial investment for any
new entrant thus setting the entry bar very high. This reduces the risk of new
entrants into the European market and should be seen as low.
3.3 Supplier
Power. As far as the European market in concerned the two named companies and a
few other larger tour companies are dominating the market to such an extent
that they can command low buying prices for tourism products. Therefore, smaller
suppliers such as niche tour operators, bed & breakfast, etc. do not have
much power if they want a steady business from established larger companies.
Supplier power should thus be seen as low.
3.4 Buyer
Power. The high availability of tourism products not only in Europe but
globally and the strong usage of the internet puts the consumer in a strong
position (Berne, Garcia-Gonzalez and Migica, 201). There are therefore low
switching costs. Cheap destinations in emerging economies such as India or
China in combination with the increase in low cost airline direct ticket sales
increases the buyer power substantially (Rosselló and Riera, 2012). Moreover, the
growing demand for environmentally sustainable tourism also puts pressure on
destinations and operators (European Commission, 2010, 2013b). Buyer power is
therefore high.
3.5
Substitution. In terms of substitution the T&T industry seems generally
safe in its existence. The only alternative for people to travel is to stay at
home. This is virtually impossible in a highly mobile world be it domestically
or internationally. However, in terms of destination there are many
alternatives. Europe is highly diverse with Nordic climates, Mediterranean
climates, beaches, mountains, forests, ancient cities, different cultures, etc.
combined with excellent infrastructure makes Europe highly competitive (Blanke
and Chiesa, 2011). However, emerging economies in South America and Africa are
seen as viable alternatives for European travelers (Viardot, 2011; European
Commission, 2013b). In this respect, the threat of substitution is relatively
high.
Overall, the
Five Forces analysis showed that the industry is very competitive and that
operators must address the relevant issues.
4.0 Threats and Opportunities
4.2
Opportunities. There are thus opportunities that European tour operators can realize.
Committing resources and priorities to support environmentally sustainable
travel and tourism is one such opportunity. Working together with destinations
and individual business of like mind by engaging, for example, in carbon
trading would encourage selective consumers to choose such operators (United
Nations, 2007; Dwyer, et al., 2009; Bohdanowicz, Zientara and Novotna, 2011).
Developing a stronger online business as is done in the USA may also help in
stemming the tide of external competitors. Europe has a strong brand image and
with appropriate destination marketing, focusing on the environment, tour
operators have a strong opportunity to maintain their pole position in the
industry (Chen, Chen and Lee, 2011; Kozak and Martin,
2012; Rosselló and Riera, 2012).
5.0 Conclusion
5.1 The
European travel and tourism (T&T) industry is dominated by only a few large
tour operators, particularly TUI and Thomas Cook, while Europe is the world’s
top tourist destination. However, there are two major threats represented by
rapid climate change and external competition. There exist opportunity to
address these threats. European tour operators need to engage in
environmentally sustainable practices together with destinations and partners.
They also need to lower their cost base by engaging more in online promotion
and selling in relation to their external competitors.
6.0
References
Berne, C., Garcia-Gonzalez, M. and Migica, J., 2012. How ICT Shifts the
Power Balance of Tourism Distribution Channels. Tourism Management, 33(1), pp.
205-214.
Blanke, J. and Chiesa, T., 2011. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness
Index 2011: Assessing Industry Drivers in the Wake of the Crisis. World
Economic Forum, Chapter 1.1, pp. 3-33.
Boffa, F. and Succurro, M., 2012. The Impact of Search Cost Reduction on
Seasonality. Annals of Tourism Research, 39(2), pp. 1176-1198.
Bohdanowicz, P., Zientara, P. and Novotna, E., 2011. International Hotel
Chains and Environmental Protection: An Analysis of Hilton's we
care! programme (Europe, 2006–2008). Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(7), pp. 797-816.
Bürki, R., Elsasser, H. And Abegg, B.,
2003. Climate Change and Winter Sports: Environmental and Economic Threats. 5th
World Conference on Sport and Environment, Turin 2-3 December 2003 (IOC/UNEP). www.unep.org/sport_env/documents/torinobuerki.doc (Accessed 04/11/2013).
Chen, C.-M.,
Chen, S.H. and Lee, H.T., 2011. The
Destination Competitiveness of Kinmen's Tourism Industry: Exploring the Interrelationships Between Tourist
Perceptions, Service Performance, Customer Satisfaction and Sustainable Tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(2), pp. 247-264.
Dwyer, L., Edwards, D., Mistilis, N., Roman, C. and Scott, N., 2009. Destination
and Enterprise Management for a Tourism Future. Tourism Management, 30(1), pp.
63-74.
European Commission, 2013a. Tourism
Statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Tourism_statistics (Accessed 04/11/2013).
European Commission, 2013b. Tourism
Trends. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Tourism_trends (Accessed 04/11/2013).
European Commission, 2010. Europe, The
World’s No. 1 Tourist Destination – A New Political Framework for Tourism in
Europe. COM(2010)352 final.
Go, F.M. and Govers, R., 2000. Integrated Quality Management for Tourist
Destinations: A European Perspective on Achieving Competitiveness. Tourism
Management, 21(1), pp. 79-88.
Komppula, R., 2014. The Role of Individual Entrepreneurs in the
Development of Competitiveness for a Rural Tourism Destination – A Case Study.
Tourism Management, 40, pp. 361-371.
Kozak, M. and Martin, D., 2012. Tourism Life Cycle and Sustainability
Analysis: Profit-Focused Strategies for Mature Destinations. Tourism
Management, 33(1), pp. 188-194.
Mazilu, M., Avram, M. and Ispas, R., 2011.
The Effects of the World Economic Crisis on the Tourist Market from Romania.
International Journal of Energy and Environment, 5(1), pp. 113-122.
Peeters, P. and Dubois, G., 2010. Tourism Travel Under Climate Change
Mitigation Constraints. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(3), pp. 447-457.
Rosselló, J. and Riera, A., 2012. Pricing European Package Tours: the
Impact of New Distribution Channels and Low-Cost Airlines. Tourism Economics,
18(2), pp. 265-279.
Scott, D., 2011. Why Sustainable Tourism Must Address Climate Change. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(1), pp. 17-34.
Scott, D. and Becken, S., 2010. Adapting to Climate Change and Climate Policy: Progress, Problems and Potentials. Journal
of Sustainable Tourism, 18(3), pp. 283-295.
Smeral, E., 2009. The Impact of the Financial and Economic Crisis on
European Tourism. Journal of Travel Research, 48(1), pp. 3-13.
Strasdas, W., 2010. Carbon Management in Tourism – A Smart Strategy in
Response to Climate Change. Trends and Issues in Global Tourism 2010, pp.
57-69.
United Nations, 2007. Climate Change
and Tourism: Responding to Global Challenges., Davos http://esa.un.org/marrakechprocess/pdf/davos_rep_advan_summ_26_09.pdf (Accessed 04/11/2013).
Viardot, E., 2011. European Tour
Operators: Confronting Competition in the Tourism Industry. Exploring Strategy
9th Edition, Johnson, Scholes & Whittington, Prentice Hall, pp.
565-568.
No comments:
Post a Comment