Sunday, October 6, 2019

Context, culture and control: a case study on accounting change in an Italian regional health service

CITATION
Spanò, R., Caldarelli, A., Ferri, L., & Maffei, M. (2019). Context, culture and control: a case study on accounting change in an Italian regional health service. Journal of Management & Governance, 1–44


For library access / research help in a similar topic: anyangoceline19@gmail.com


ABSTRACT
The current paper relies upon Broadbent and Laughlin’s (Manag Account Res 20(4):283–295, 2009, Accounting control and controlling accounting: interdisciplinary and critical perspectives, Emerald, Bingley, 2013) notion of culture, context, and steering mechanisms to understand how context and culture mould PMS change in healthcare switching from one pathway to another. It employs the case study of an Italian regional health service carried out over a 3-year period (2010–2013) with 25 semi-structured interviews with relevant actors (regional councillors, CEOs of healthcare organisations, and physicians that are heads of health departments), and including the retrospective collection of data on the period 2005–2009 through respondents’ views supported by secondary data. The findings show a switch from the reorientation trough absorption response of the first period (2005–2009) to the reorientation trough boundary management towards evolution response of the second period (2010–2013). They highlight that this is the result of a change in context and the leading rationalities towards a policy based on cooperation and stakeholder dialogue through the development of a common language helping to supersede previous inability to interact. It enlightens that the change in the RHS came about in the wake of a hybridisation of all the actors involved which can be construed as an enlargement in their interpretive schemes happening at the individual level and influencing the organisational level. In the study RHS the change in context and culture favoured the formation of a managerial logic and an enrichment of the value system of the organisation towards a well-functioning PMS. In turn the PMS daily helps to reinforce the cooperative and dialogic approach, prompting a virtuous circle, and offering broader insights relevant to theory, practice, and the policymakers.


REFERENCES
  1. Abernethy, M. A., & Stoelwinder, J. U. (1995). The role of professional control in the management of complex organizations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(1), 1–17.
  2. Abernethy, M. A., & Vagnoni, E. (2004). Power, organization design and managerial behaviour. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(2), 207–225.
  3. Agrizzi, D., Agyemang, G., & Jaafaripooyan, E. (2016). Conforming to accreditation in Iranian hospitals. Accounting Forum, 40(2), 106–124.
  4. Agyemang, G., & Broadbent, J. (2015). Management control systems and research management in universities: An empirical and conceptual exploration. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 28(7), 1018–1046.
  5. Ahrens, T., & Chapman, C. S. (2007). Management accounting as practice. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1), 1–27.
  6. Aimone Gigio, L., Alampi, D., Camussi, S. A., Ciaccio, G., Guaitini, P., Lozzi, Mancini, A. L., Panicara, E., & Paolicelli, M. (2018). La Sanità in Italia: Il Difficile Equilibrio Tra Vincoli Di Bilancio E Qualità Dei Servizi Nelle Regioni in Piano Di Rientro. Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers), Banca d’Italia.
  7. Alvesson, M., & Deetz, S. (2000). Doing critical management research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  8. Anessi Pessina, E. (2006). Il modello di analisi, l’impostazione del rapporto e i principali risultati. In E. Anessi Pessina & E. Cantù (Eds.), Rapporto OASI 2006 sullo stato dell’aziendalizzazione nella sanità italiana. Egea: Milano.
  9. Anthony, R. N., & Young, D. W. (2005). Management Control in Non Profìt Organisation (7th ed.). New York City: McGraw-Hill.
  10. Brignall, S., & Modell, S. (2000). An institutional perspective on performance measurement and management in the ‘new public sector’. Management accounting Research, 11(3), 281–306.
  11. Broadbent, J. (1992). Change in organisations: A case study of the use of accounting information in the NHS. British Accounting Review, 24(4), 343–367.
  12. Broadbent, J. (2007). If you can’t measure it, how can you manage it? Management and governance in higher educational institutions. Public Money and Management27(3), 193–198.
  13. Broadbent, J., Gallop, C., & Laughlin, R. (2010). Analysing societal regulatory control systems with specific reference to higher education in England. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23(49), 506–531.
  14. Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (1992). Changes in the public sector: A review of recent alternative accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5(2), 167–193.
  15. Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (2008). Public sector to public services: 20 years of ‘contextual’ accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 21(2), 129–169.
  16. Broadbent, J., Jacobs, K., & Laughlin, R. (2001). Organisational resistance strategies to unwanted accounting and finance changes. The case of general medical practice in the UK. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 14(5), 565–586.
  17. Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2009). Performance management systems: A conceptual model. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 283–295.
  18. Broadbent, J., & Laughlin, R. (2013). Accounting control and controlling accounting: Interdisciplinary and critical perspectives. Bingley: Emerald.
  19. Burns, J., & Vaivio, J. (2001). Management accounting change. Management Accounting Research, 12(4), 389–402.
  20. Busco, C., Caglio, A., & Scapens, R. (2015). Management and accounting innovations: Reflecting on what they are and why they are adopted. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(3), 495–524.
  21. Caldarelli, A., Fiondella, C., Maffei, M., Spanò, R., & Aria, M. (2013). Ceo Performance evaluation systems: Empirical findings from the Italian Regional Health Services. Public money and management, 33(5), 369–376.
  22. Caldarelli, A., Maffei, M., & Spanò, R. (2012). I sistemi di valutazione della performance dei Direttori Generali come processo trasformazionale. Un’analisi empirica dei Servizi Sanitari Regionali Italiani. Management Control, 3(3), 37–62.
  23. Campanale, C., & Cinquini, L. (2015). Emerging pathways of colonization in healthcare from participative approaches to management accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 39, 59–74.
  24. Chua, W. F., & Degeling, P. (1993). Interrogating an accounting-based intervention on three axes: Instrumental, moral and aesthetic. Accounting Organization and Society, 18(4), 291–318.
  25. Chua, W., & Preston, A. (1994). Worrying about accounting in health care. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 7(3), 4–17.
  26. Cinquini, L., Collini, P., Marelli, A., & Tenucci, A. (2015). Change in the relevance of cost information and costing systems: Evidence from two Italian surveys. Journal of Management and Governance, 19(3), 557–587.
  27. Conrad, L., & Uslu, P. G. (2011). Investigation of the impact of ‘Payment by Results’ on performance measurement and management in NHS Trusts. Management Accounting Research, 22(1), 46–55.
  28. Coombs, R. W. (1987). Accounting for the control of doctors: Management information systems in hospitals. Accounting Organization and Society, 12(4), 389–404.
  29. Dent, J. F. (1991). Accounting and organisational cultures: A field study of the emergence of a new organisational reality. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 16(8), 705–732.
  30. Dunphy, D. C., & Doug, A. S. (1988). Transformational and coercive strategies for planned organizational change: Beyond the O.D. model. Organization Studies, 9(3), 317–334.
  31. Eeckloo, K., Delesie, L., & Vleugels, A. (2007). Where is the pilot? The changing shapes of governance in the European hospital sector. The journal of the Royal Society for the promotion of health, 127(2), 78–86.
  32. Eldenburg, L., Soderstrom, N., Willis, V., & Wu, A. (2010). Behavioural changes following the collaborative development of an accounting information system. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 222–237.
  33. Ezzamel, M., Robson, K., & Stapleton, P. (2012). The logics of budgeting: Theorization and practice variation in the educational field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(5), 281–303.
  34. Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263–282.
  35. Fiondella, C., Macchioni, R., Maffei, M., & Spanò, R. (2016). Successful changes in management accounting systems: A case study on healthcare. Accounting Forum, 40(3), 186–204.
  36. Formez. (2007). I sistemi di Governance dei Servizi Sanitari Regionali. Available online at: http://db.formez.it/progettiformez.nsf/f9f6fe87ce424bc3c125696500252e1a/d991a76260d813a8c12570d00059ad02?OpenDocument. Accessed 1 Dec 2018.
  37. Gerdin, J., & Greve, J. (2008). The appropriateness of statistical methods for testing contingency hypotheses in management accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(7), 995–1009.
  38. Greenwood, R., Hinings, C. R., & Brown, J. (1988). Organizational design types, tracks and the dynamics of strategic change. Organization Studies, 9(3), 293–316.
  39. Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (Vol. I). Boston: Beacon.
  40. Habermas, J. (2005). Equal treatment of cultures and the limits of postmodern liberalism. Journal of Political Philosophy, 13(1), 1–28.
  41. Hirst, M. K. (1981). Accounting information and the evaluation of subordinate performance: A situational approach. Accounting Review, 1(4), 771–784.
  42. Hohendahl, P. U., & Silberman, M. (1979). Critical theory, public sphere and culture. Jürgen Habermas and his critics. New German Critique, 16, 89–118.
  43. Hopper, T., & Bui, B. (2016). Has management accounting research been critical? Management Accounting Research, 31, 10–30.
  44. Jacobs, K., Marcon, G., & Witt, D. (2004). Cost and performance information for doctors: An international comparison. Management Accounting Research, 15(3), 337–354.
  45. Jarvinen, J. (2006). Institutional pressures for adopting new cost accounting systems in Finnish hospitals: Two longitudinal case study. Financial Accountability and Management, 22(1), 21–46.
  46. Jones, C. S. (1999). Developing financial accountability in British acute hospitals. Financial Accounting and Management, 15(1), 1–20.
  47. Kurunmaki, L. (2004). A hybrid profession: The acquisition of management accounting expertise by medical professional. Accounting Organization and Society, 29(3/4), 327–347.
  48. Kurunmäki, L., & Miller, P. (2011). Regulatory hybrids: Partnerships, budgeting and modernising government. Management Accounting Research, 22(4), 220–241.
  49. Lapsley, I. (2008). The Npm agenda: Back to the future. Financial Accountability and Management, 24(1), 77–96.
  50. Laughlin, R. C. (1987). Accounting systems in organisational contexts: A case for critical theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society12(5), 479–502.
  51. Laughlin, R. (1991). Environmental disturbances and organizational transitions and transformations: Some alternative models. Organization Studies, 12(2), 209–232.
  52. Laughlin, R. (1995a). Empirical research in accounting: Alternative approaches and a case for middle-range thinking. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8(1), 63–87.
  53. Laughlin, R. (1995b). Methodological themes—Empirical research in accounting: Alternative approaches and the case for middle range thinking. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 8(1), 63–87.
  54. Laughlin, R. (2007). Critical reflections on research approaches, accounting regulation and the regulation of accounting. The British Accounting Review, 39(4), 271–289.
  55. Laughlin, R., & Broadbent, J. (1993). Accounting and law: Partners in the juridification of the public sector in the UK? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 4(4), 337–368.
  56. Laughlin, R., Broadbent, J., & Willig-Atherton, H. (1994). Recent financial and administrative changes in GP practices in the UK: Initial experiences and effects. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal7(3), 96–124.
  57. Lehman, G. (2006). Perspectives on language, accountability and critical accounting: An interpretative perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(6), 755–779.
  58. Lehman, G. (2013). Critical reflections on Laughlin’s middle range research approach: Language not mysterious? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(3), 211–224.
  59. Lehtonen, T. (2007). DRG-based prospective pricing and case-mix accounting—Exploring the mechanisms of successful implementation. Management Accounting Research, 18(4), 367–395.
  60. Liguori, M. (2012a). Radical change, accounting and public sector reforms: A comparison of italian and canadian municipalities. Financial Accountability and Management, 28(4), 437–463.
  61. Liguori, M. (2012b). The supremacy of the sequence: Key elements and dimensions in the process of change. Organization Studies, 33(4), 507–539.
  62. Liguori, M., & Steccolini, I. (2011). Accounting change: Explaining the outcomes, interpreting the process. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25(1), 27–70.
  63. Liguori, M., & Steccolini, I. (2014). Accounting, innovation and public-sector change. Translating reforms into change? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 25(4/5), 319–323.
  64. Longo, M. (2003). European integration: Between micro-regionalism and globalism. Journal of common market studies, 41(3), 475–494.
  65. Manes Rossi, F., Allini, A., Spanò, R., & Macchioni, R. (2018). Performance management change in archaeological sites: The case of Herculaneum conservation project. Journal of Management and Governance., 5, 4.  https://doi-org.ezproxy.scu.edu.au/10.1007/s10997-018-9416-x.
  66. Messner, M. (2016). Does industry matter? How industry context shapes management accounting practice. Management Accounting Research, 31(1), 103–111.
  67. Miller, P. (1992). Accounting and objectivity: The invention of calculating selves and calculable spaces. Annals of scholarship, 9(1/2), 61–86.
  68. Miller, J. L. (2002). The board as a monitor of organisational activity. The applicability of agency theory to nonprofit boards. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12 (4), 429-450.
  69. Miller, P., & O’Leary, T. (1987). Accounting and the construction of the governable person. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12(3), 235–265.
  70. Mir, Z. M., & Shiraz Rahaman, A. (2007). Accounting and public sector reforms: A study of a continuously evolving governmental agency in Australia. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 20(2), 237–268.
  71. Modell, S. (2003). Goals versus institutions: The development of performance measurement in the Swedish university sector. Management Accounting Research, 14(4), 433–459.
  72. Modell, S. (2005). Students as consumers? An institutional field-level analysis of the construction of performance measurement practices. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 18(4), 537–563.
  73. Nuti, S., Seghieri, C., & Vainieri, M. (2013). Assessing the effectiveness of a performance evaluation system in the public health care sector: some novel evidence from the Tuscany region experience. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(1), 59–69.
  74. Nuti, S., Vola, F., Bonini, A., & Vainieri, M. (2016). Making governance work in the health care sector: Evidence from a ‘natural experiment’in Italy. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 11(1), 17–38.
  75. Otley, D. T. (1978). Budget use and managerial performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 1(1), 122–149.
  76. Power, M. (2013). Theory and theorization: A comment on Laughlin and Habermas. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(3), 225–227.
  77. Power, M., & Laughlin, R. (1996). Habermas, law and accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(5), 441–465.
  78. Preston, A. M. (1992). The birth of clinical accounting: A study of the emergence and transformations of discourses on costs and practices of accounting in US hospitals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(1), 63–100.
  79. Ragin, C., Drass, K., & Davey, S. (2006). Fuzzy-set/qualitative comparative analysis 2.0 Tucson, Arizona: Department of Sociology, University of Arizona.
  80. Schatzki, T. R. (1996). Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  81. Schatzki, T. (2002). The site of the social: A philosophical exploration of the constitution of social life and change. USA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  82. Spanò, R. (2016). L’evoluzione dei sistemi di Management Accounting nelle aziende sanitarie. Accountability e fattori di complessità. Torino: Giappichelli Editore.
  83. Spanò, R., Allini, A., Caldarelli, A., & Zampella, A. (2017). Controlling innovation and innovating control: insights from a knowledge intensive network. Business Process Management Journal, 23(6), 1359–1384.
  84. Ter Bogt, H. J., & Scapens, R. W. (2008). Performance measurement in universities: A comparative study of two A&F groups in the Netherlands and the UK. In Paper presented at the EIASM Conference on Accounting, Auditing and Management in Public Sector Reforms in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 3–5 Sept, 2008.
  85. Trochim, W. M. K., & Donnelly, J. P. (2006). The research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Atomic Dog Publishing.
  86. Wickramasinghe, D. (2015). Getting management accounting off the ground: Post-colonial neoliberalism in healthcare budgets. Accounting and Business Research, 45(3), 323–355.
  87. Wouters, M., & Roijmans, D. (2011). Using prototypes to induce experimentation and knowledge integration in the development of enabling accounting information. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(2), 708–736.
  88. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage Publications.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Slaughtered and the Survivors: Collaboration Between Social Economy Organizations as a Key to Success in Times of Financial Crisis

CITATION López-Arceiz, F., Bellostas, A., & Rivera-Torres, M. (2017). The Slaughtered and the Survivors: Collaboration Between Social ...