Bergh, D., Aguinis, H., Heavey, C.,
Ketchen, D., Boyd, B., Su, P., … Joo, H.
(2016). Using meta‐analytic
structural equation modeling to advance strategic management research:
Guidelines and an empirical illustration via the strategic leadership‐performance relationship. Strategic Management Journal, 37(3),
477–497.
For library access / research help in a similar topic: anyangoceline19@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
This paper demonstrates how meta-analysis can be combined with structural equation modeling
(MASEM) to address new questions in strategic management research. We review this integration,
describe its implementation, and compare findings from bivariate meta-analyses, a direct-effect
structural equations model, and two mediating frameworks using data on the strategic leadership
and performance relationship. Results drawn from 208 articles that collectively included data on
495,638 observations demonstrate the new insights available from MASEM while also suggesting
a revision to conventional thinking on strategic leadership. Whereas some theories posit that
boards of directors influence firm performance through monitoring and disciplining the top
management team, MASEM provides more support for the view that boards mediate the top
management teams’ decisions. Implications for applying MASEM in strategic management are
offered.
REFERENCES
Aguinis H, Beaty JC, Boik RJ, Pierce CA. 2005. Effect
size using power in assessing moderating effects of categorical
variables using multiple regression: a 30-year
review. Journal of Applied Psychology 90(1): 94–107.
Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Wright TA. 2011a.
Best-practice recommendations for estimating
interaction effects using meta-analysis. Journal of
Organizational Behavior 32(8): 1033–1043.
Aguinis H, Pierce CA, Bosco FA, Dalton DR, Dalton
CM. 2011b. Debunking myths and urban legends
about meta-analysis. Organizational Research Methods
14(2): 306–331.
Aguinis H, Harden EE. 2009. Sample size rules of thumb.
In Statistical and Methodological Myths and Urban
Legends, Lance CE, Vandenberg RJ (eds). Routledge:
New York; 267–286.
Amihud Y, Lev B. 1981. Risk reduction as a managerial
motive for conglomerate mergers. Bell Journal of Economics
12(2): 605–617.
Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R. 2010. On
making causal claims: a review and recommendations.
Leadership Quarterly 21(6): 1086–1120.
Aytug ZG, Rothstein HR, Zhou W, Kern MC. 2012.
Revealed or concealed? Transparency of procedures,
decisions, and judgment calls in meta-analyses. Organizational
Research Methods 15(1): 103–133.
Baer M, Dirks KT, Nickerson JA. 2013. Microfoundations
of strategic problem formulation. Strategic Management
Journal 34(2): 197–214.
Bergh DD, Johnson RA, Dewitt R-L. 2008. Restructuring
through spin-off or sell-off: transforming information
asymmetries into financial gain. Strategic Management
Journal 29(2): 133–148.
Berry CM, Lelchook AM, Clark MA. 2011. A
meta-analysis of the interrelationships between
employee lateness, absenteeism, and turnover: implications
for models of withdrawal behavior. Journal of
Organizational Behavior 33(5): 678–699.
Bettis R, Ghambardella A, Helfat C, Mitchell W. 2014.
Quantitative empirical analysis in strategic management.
Strategic Management Journal 35(7): 949–953.
Boyd BK, Bergh DD,Ketchen DJ. 2010. Reconsidering the
reputation-performance relationship: a resource-based
view. Journal of Management 36(3): 588–609.
Brown SD, Tramayne S, Hoxha D, Telander K, Fan
X, Lent RW. 2008. Social cognitive predictors of
college students’ academic performance and persistence:
a meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational
Behavior 72(3): 298–308.
Burke MJ, Landis RS. 2003. Methodological and conceptual
challenges in conducting and interpreting metaanalyses.
In Validity Generalization: A Critical Review,
Murphy KR (ed). Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ; 287–309.
Campbell D, Stanley J. 1963. Experimental and
Quasi-experimental Designs for Research.
Rand-McNally: Chicago, IL.
Capon N, Farley JU, Hoenig S. 1990. Determinants of
financial performance: a meta-analysis. Management
Science 36(10): 1143–1159
Carmines EG, Zeller RA. 1979. Reliability and Validity
Assessment. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.
Carney M, Gedajlovic ER, Heugens PMAR, Van Essen
M, Oosterhout JH. 2011. Business group affiliation,
performance, context, and strategy: a meta-analysis.
Academy of Management Journal 54(4): 437–460.
Carpenter MA, Geletkanycz MA, Sanders WG. 2004.
Upper echelons research revisited: antecedents, elements,
and consequences of top management team
composition. Journal of Management 30(6): 749–778.
Certo ST, Lester RH, Dalton CM, Dalton DR. 2006. Top
management teams, strategy and financial performance:
a meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management
Studies 43(4): 813–839.
Chan KC, Chan KC, Seow GS, Tam K. 2009. Ranking
accounting journals using dissertation citation analysis:
a research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society
34(6): 875–885.
Chen CR, Huang Y. 2007. Author affiliation index, finance
journal ranking, and the pattern of authorship. Journal
of Corporate Finance 13(5): 1008–1026.
Cheung MWL. 2008. A model for integrating fixed-,
random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural
equation modeling. Psychological Methods 13(3):
182–202.
Cheung MWL, Chan W. 2005. Meta-analytic structural
equation modeling: a two-stage approach. Psychological
Methods 10(1): 40–64.
Colquitt JA, LePine JA, Noe RA. 2000. Toward an integrative
theory of training motivation: a meta-analytic path
analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology
85(5): 678–707.
Combs J, Crook T, Shook C. 2005. The dimensionality
of organizational performance and its implications
for strategic management research. In Research
Methodology in Strategy and Management, (Volume
2), Ketchen DB (ed). Emerald Group Publisher: Bingley,
UK; 259–286.
Combs JG, Ketchen DJ, Crook TR, Roth PL. 2011. Assessing
cumulative evidence within ‘macro’ research: why
meta-analysis should be preferred over vote counting.
Journal of Management Studies 48(1): 178–197.
Cook TD, Campbell DT. 1979. Quasi-experimentation:
Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings.
Houghton Mifflin Company: Boston, MA.
Crook TR, Ketchen DJ, Combs JG, Todd SY. 2008.
Strategic resources and performance: a meta-analysis.
Strategic Management Journal 29(11): 1141–1154.
Dalton DR, Aguinis H, Dalton CM, Bosco FA, Pierce
CA. 2012. Revisiting the file drawer problem in
meta-analysis: an assessment of published and unpublished
correlation matrices. Personnel Psychology
65(2): 221–249.
Dalton DR, Daily CM, Ellstrand AE, Johnson JL. 1998.
Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership
structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management
Journal 19(3): 269–290.
Dalton DR, Daily CM, Johnson JL, Ellstrand AE. 1999.
Number of directors and financial performance: a
meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal 42(6):
674–686.
Dalton DR, Dalton CM. 2005. Strategic management
studies are a special case for meta-analysis. In Research
Methodology in Strategy and Management, (Volume
2), Ketchen DJ, Bergh DD (eds). Emerald Group
Publishing Limited: Bradford, UK; 31–63.
Davis GF. 2010. Do theories of organizations progress?
Organizational Research Methods 13(4): 690–709.
Deutsch Y. 2005. The impact of board composition on
firms’ critical decisions: a meta-analytic review. Journal
of Management 31(3): 424–444.
Drees JM, Heugens PPAMR. 2013. Synthesizing and
extending resource dependence theory: a meta-analysis.
Journal of Management 39(6): 1666–1698.
Duriau VJ, Reger RK, Pfarrer MD. 2007. A content analysis
of the content analysis literature in organization
studies: research themes, data sources, and methodological
refinements. Organizational Research Methods
10(1): 5–34.
Earnest DR, Allen DG, Landis RS. 2011. Mechanisms
linking realistic job previews with turnover: a
meta-analytic path analysis. Personnel Psychology
64(4): 865–897.
Eby LT, Freeman DM, Rush MC, Lance CE. 1999. Motivational
bases of affective organizational commitment:
a partial test of an integrative theoretical model. Journal
of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 72(4):
463–483.
Edwards JF. 2010. Reconsidering theoretical progress in
organizational and management research. Organizational
Research Methods 13(4): 615–619.
Erez A, Bloom M, Wells M. 1996. Using random rather
than fixed effectsmodels in meta-analysis: implications
for situational specificity and validity generalization.
Personnel Psychology 49(2): 275–306.
Eysenck HJ. 1978. An exercise in mega-silliness. American
Psychologist 33(5): 517.
Fama EF, Jensen MC. 1983. Separation of ownership
and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26(2):
301–325.
Fan H, Jackson T, Yang X, Tang W, Zhang J. 2010.
The factor structure of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso
Emotional Intelligence Test V 2.0 (MSCEIT): a
meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach.
Personality and Individual Differences 48(7):
781–785.
Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC. 1996. Strategic Leadership:
Top Executives and their Effects on Organizations.
West: Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN.
Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC, Cannella AA. 2009. Strategic
Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top
Management Teams, and Boards. Oxford University
Press: New York.
Furlow CF, Beretvas SN. 2005. Meta-analytic methods
of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation
modeling under different patterns of missing data.
Psychological Methods 10(2): 227–254.
Geyskens I, Steenkamp JBEM, Kumar N. 2006. Make,
buy, or ally: a transaction cost theory meta-analysis.
Academy of Management Journal 49(3): 519–543.
Glass GV, McGaw B, Smith ML. 1981. Meta-Analysis in
Social Research. Academic Press: Orlando, FL.
Golden BR, Zajac EJ. 2001. When will boards influence
strategy? Inclination×power = strategic change. Strategic
Management Journal 22(12): 1087–1111.
Graham JM. 2011. Measuring love in romantic relationships:
a meta-analysis. Journal of Social and Personal
Relationships 28(6): 748–771.
Hoskisson RE, Johnson RA, Moesel DD. 1994. Corporate
divestiture intensity in restructuring firms: effects of
governance, strategy, and performance. Academy of
Management Journal 37(5): 1207–1251.
Hu L, Bentler PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes
in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria
versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling
6(1): 1–55.
Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. 2004. Methods of Meta-Analysis:
Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Sage:
Thousand Oaks, CA.
Johnson JW, Carter GW, Davison HK, Oliver DH. 2001.
A synthetic validity approach to testing differential
prediction hypotheses. Journal of Applied Psychology
86(4): 774–780.
Judge TA, Bono JE, Ilies R, Gerhardt M. 2002. Personality
and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review.
Journal of Applied Psychology 87(4): 765–780.
Kepes S, McDaniel MA, Brannick MT, Banks GC. 2013.
Meta-analytic reviews in the organizational sciences:
two meta-analytic schools on the way to MARS (the
Meta-analytic Reporting Standards). Journal of Business
and Psychology 28(2): 123–143.
Ketchen DJ, Combs JG, Russell CJ, Shook C, Dean MA,
Runge J, Lohrke FT, Naumann SE, Haptonstahl DE,
Baker R, Beckstein BA, Handler C, Honig H, Lamoureux
S. 1997. Organizational configurations and performance:
a meta-analysis. Academy of Management
Journal 40(1): 223–240.
Lance CE, Butts MM, Michels LC. 2006. The sources
of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: what did
they really say? Organizational Research Methods 9(2):
202–220.
Landis RS. 2013. Successfully combining meta-analysis
and structural equation modeling: recommendations
and strategies. Journal of Business and Psychology
28(3): 251–261.
Lane PJ, Cannella AA, Lubatkin MH. 1998. Agency problems
as antecedents to unrelated mergers and diversification:
Amihud and Lev reconsidered. Strategic Management
Journal 19(6): 555–578.
LeBreton JM, Senter JL. 2008. Answers to 20 questions
about interrater reliability and interrater agreement.
Organizational Research Methods 11(4): 815–854.
Lee D, Madhavan R. 2010. Divestiture and firm performance:
a meta-analysis. Journal of Management 36(6):
1345–1371.
van Mierlo H, Vermunt JK, Rutte CG. 2009. Composing
group-level constructs from individual-level survey
data. Organizational Research Methods 12(2):
368–392.
Ng TWH, Feldman DC. 2010. The relationships of age
with job attitudes: a meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology
63(3): 677–718.
Nye CD, Drasgow F. 2011. Assessing goodness of fit: simple
rules of thumb simply don’t work. Organizational
Research Methods 14(4): 548–570.
Pearce JA, Zahra SA. 1991. The relative power of CEOs
and boards of directors: associations with corporate
performance. Strategic Management Journal 12(2):
135–153.
Pfeffer JS, Salancik G. 1978. The External Control of
Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective.
Harper and Row: New York.
Pitcher P, Smith AD. 2001. Top management team heterogeneity:
personality, power, and proxies. Organization
Science 12(1): 1–18.
Podsakoff PM, Mackenzie SB, Bachrach DG, Podsakoff
NP. 2005. The influence of management journals in the
1980s and 1990s. Strategic Management Journal 26(5):
473–488.
Popper KR. 1963. Conjectures and Refutations: The
Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Harper and Row: New
York.
Rhoades DL, Rechner PL, Sundaramurthy C. 2001. A
meta-analysis of board leadership structure and financial
performance: are “two heads better than one”?
Corporate Governance: An International Review 9(4):
311–319.
Rindova VP,Williamson IO, Petkova AP, Sever JM. 2005.
Being good or being known: an empirical examination
of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of
organizational reputation. Academy of Management
Journal 48(6): 1033–1049.
Robbins SB, Oh I-S, Le H, Button C. 2009. Intervention
effects on college performance and retention as
mediated bymotivational, emotional, and social control
factors: integrated meta-analytic path analyses. Journal
of Applied Psychology 94(5): 1163–1184.
Roesch SC, Weiner B. 2001. A meta-analytic review
of coping with illness: do causal attributions matter?
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 50(4): 205–219.
Schmidt FL, Le H. 2005. Software for the Hunter-Schmidt
Meta-Analysis Methods (Version 1.1) [Computer Software].
University of Iowa, Department of Management
& Organization: Iowa City, IA.
Semadeni M, Withers MC, Certo T. 2014. The perils
of endogeneity and instrumental variables in strategy
research: understanding through simulation. Strategic
Management Journal 35(7): 1070–1079.
Shadish WR. 1996. Meta-analysis and the exploration of
association mediating processes: a primer of examples,
methods, and issues. Psychological Methods 1(1):
47–65.
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. 2002. Experimental
and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Generalized
Causal Inference. Houghton Mifflin: Boston, MA.
Shook CL, Ketchen DJ, Hult GTM, Kacmar KM. 2004. An
assessment of the use of structural equationmodeling in
strategic management research. Strategic Management
Journal 25(4): 397–404.
Sirmon DG, Hitt MA, Ireland RD. 2007. Managing firm
resources in dynamic environments to create value:
looking inside the black box. Academy of Management
Review 32(1): 273–292.
Tokunaga RS, Rains SA. 2010. An evaluation of two characterizations of the relationships between problematic
Internet use, time spent using the Internet, and psychosocial
problems. Human Communication Research
36(4): 512–545.
Van Den Noortgate W, Onghena P. 2003. Multilevel
meta-analysis: a comparison with traditional metaanalytical
procedures. Educational and Psychological
Measurement 63(5): 765–790.
Van Essen M, Otten JA, Carberry EJ. 2012. Assessing
managerial power theory: a meta-analytic approach
to understanding the determinants of CEO compensation.
Journal of Management. Online First DOI:
10.1177/0149206311429378
Viswesvaran C, Ones DS. 1995. Theory testing: combining
psychometric meta-analysis and structural equations
modeling. Personnel Psychology 48(4): 865–885.
Westphal JD. 1999. Collaboration in the boardroom:
behavioral and performance consequences of CEOboard
social ties. Academy of Management Journal
42(1): 7–24.
Wiersema MF, Bowen HP. 2009. The use of limited
dependent variable techniques in strategy research:
issues and methods. Strategic Management Journal
30(6): 679–692.
Wood J. 2008. Methodology for dealing with duplicate
effects in a meta-analysis. Organizational Research
Methods 11(1): 79–95.
Zald MN. 1969. The power and functions of boards of
directors: a theoretical synthesis. American Journal of
Sociology 75(1): 97–111.
No comments:
Post a Comment