Monday, September 30, 2019

The potential for “boundary-spanning organisations” in addressing the research-practice gap in sustainability accounting

CITATION
Christ, K., Burritt, R., Guthrie, J., & Evans, E. (2018). The potential for “boundary-spanning organisations” in addressing the research-practice gap in sustainability accounting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal9(4), 552–568.

 For library access / research help in a similar topic: anyangoceline19@gmail.com


ABSTRACT
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to understand the role of boundary-spanning organisations as
intermediary institutions potentially able to close the gap between applied research and practice in
sustainability accounting.
Design/methodology/approach – A review of the literature reveals that boundary organisation theory
provides a potential way of understanding the role of boundary-spanning organisations in the context of the
research–practice gap. The theory is applied in the context of three cases of potential boundary-spanning
organisations involved with sustainability accounting – Chartered Accountants in Australia and New
Zealand, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development and the International Federation of
Accountants.
Findings – Findings from the three cases, which consider the application of boundary organisation theory,
indicate the potential for professional accounting associations to act as sustainability accounting boundaryspanning
organisations has not been realized for four main reasons. These relate to the need for finer
granularity in relation to boundary objects and problem-solving; uncertainty about the range of parties to be
involved as boundary-spanning organisations; the importance of reconciling views about different incentives
for academics and practitioners in the sustainability accounting space; and the necessity for collaboration
with other boundary-spanning organisations to address the transdisciplinary nature of sustainability
accounting.
Practical implications – Development of a way of seeing the relationships between academics and
practitioners in the context of sustainability accounting has two messages for practice and practitioners. First,
with such complex and uncertain issues as sustainability accounting, a transdisciplinary approach to
resolving problems is needed, one which involves practitioners as integral and equal members of research
teams. The process should help bring applied academic and practitioner interests closer together. Second, it
has to be recognised that academics conducting basic research do not seek to engage with practitioners, and
for this group, the academic–practitioner gap will remain.
Social implications – Two main social implications emerge from the application of boundary
organisation theory to analyse the academic–practitioner gap in the context of sustainability accounting.
First, development of boundary organisations is important, as they can play a crucial role in bringing parties
with an interest in sustainability accounting together in transdisciplinary teams to help solve sustainability
problems. Second, collaboration is a foundation for success in the process of integrating applied researchers and practitioners, different disciplines which are relevant to solving sustainability problems and collaboration
between different boundary spanning organisations with their own specialised foci.
Originality/value – This paper considers boundary organisation theory and the role of boundaryspanning
organisations in the context of the complex transdisciplinary problems of sustainability accounting


REFERENCES
Adams, C.A. and Larrinaga-González, C. (2007), “Engaging with organisations in pursuit of improved
sustainability accounting and performance”, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
Vol. 20 No. 3, pp. 333-355.

Amabile, T.M., Patterson, C., Mueller, J., Wojcik, T., Odomirok, P.W., Marsh,M. and Kramer, S.J. (2001),
“Academic-practitioner collaboration in management research: a case of cross-profession
collaboration”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 44 No. 2, pp. 418-431.

Bakker, P. (2013), “Accountants will save the world”, Harvard Business Review, 5 March, available at:
https://hbr.org/2013/03/accountants-will-save-the-world

Bansal, P., Bertels, S., Ewart, T., MacConnachie, P. and O’Brien, J. (2012), “Bridging the research–
practice gap”, Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 73-92.

Bartunek, J.M. (2007), “Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research:
toward a relational scholarship of integration”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 50 No. 6,
pp. 1323-1333.

Bartunek, J.M. and Rynes, S.L. (2014), “Academics and practitioners are alike and unlike the paradoxes
of academic–practitioner relationships”, Journal of Management, Vol. 40 No. 5, pp. 1181-1201.

Bernstein, J.H. (2015), “Transdisciplinarity: a review of its origins, development, and current issues”,
Journal of Research Practice, Vol. 11 No. 1, p. 1.

Brennan, R. (2004), “Should we worry about an academic practitioner divide in marketing?”, Marketing
Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 22 No. 5, pp. 492-500.

Burritt, R. and Christ, K. (2015), “The water crisis and management implications for accountants
in business”, International Federation of Accountants Global Knowledge Gateway,
available at: www.ifac.org/global-knowledge-gateway/sustainability/discussion/watercrisis-
and-management-implications (accessed 19 June 2017).

Burritt, R. and Tingey-Holyoak, J. (2011), “Sustainability accounting research and professional practice:
mind the gap”, Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia Academic Leadership Series,
Vol. 2, pp. 110-119.

Burritt, R., Guthrie, J. and Evans, E. (2016), “Professional associations – past contributions, present
tensions and future opportunities”, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand
Academic Leadership Series, Vol. 7, pp. 9-22.

Burritt, R., Guthrie, J., Evans, E. and Christ, K. (2017), “Expanding collaboration between industry and
business faculties in Australia”, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand Academic
Leadership Series, Vol. 8, pp. 9-26.

Burritt, R.L. and Tingey-Holyoak, J. (2012), “Forging cleaner production: the importance of academicpractitioner
links for successful sustainability embedded carbon accounting”, Journal of Cleaner
Production, Vol. 36, pp. 39-47.

CAANZ (2017a), “Work for us”, Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand, available at: www.
charteredaccountantsanz.com/about-us/what-we-do/work-for-us (accessed 18 June 2017).

CAANZ (2017b), “Sustainability and our profession”, Chartered Accountants Australia and New
Zealand, available at: www.charteredaccountantsanz.com/member-services/technical/businessissues/
sustainability (accessed 18 June 2017).

CAANZ (2017c), “Accounting for sustainability: from sustainability to business resilience”, Chartered
Accountants Australia and New Zealand, available at: www.ifac.org/publications-resources/
accounting-sustainability-sustainability-business-resilience (accessed 18 June 2017).

Carr, A. and Wilkinson, R. (2005), “Beyond participation: boundary organizations as a new space for
farmers and scientists to interact”, Society and Natural Resources, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 255-265.

Christ, K. and Burritt, R. (2017), “Extending environmental cost accounting to the supply chain”,
International Federation of Accountants Global Knowledge Gateway, available at: www.ifac.
org/global-knowledge-gateway/performance-financial-management/discussion/extending-e
nvironmental-cost (accessed 19 June 2017).

Franks, J. (2010), “Boundary organizations for sustainable land management: the example of Dutch
environmental co-operatives”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 70 No. 2, pp. 283-295.

Franks, J.R. (2016), “An application of boundary organisation theory to develop landscape-scale
conservation in formal Agri-environment schemes”, Sociologia Ruralis, Vol. 56 No. 1, pp. 48-73.

Gendron, Y. (2015), “Accounting academia and the threat of the paying-off mentality”, Critical
Perspectives on Accounting, Vol. 26, pp. 168-176.

Guston, D.H. (1999), “Stabilizing the boundary between US politics and science: the role of the
office of technology transfer as a boundary organization”, Social Studies of Science, Vol. 29
No. 1, pp. 87-111.

Guston, D.H. (2001), “Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: an introduction”,
Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 399-408.

Guthrie, J., Burritt, R. and Evans, E. (2011), “The relationship between academic accounting research
and professional practice: bridging the gap between academic accounting research and
professional practice”, Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia Academic Leadership
Series, Vol. 2, pp. 9-20.

Hughes, T., O’Regan, N. and Wornham, D. (2008), “The credibility issue: closing the academic/
practitioner gap”, Strategic Change, Vol. 17 Nos 7/8, pp. 215-233.

IFAC (2005), International Guidance on Environmental Management Accounting, International
Federation of Accountants, New York, NY.

IFAC (2009), Sustainability Framework. Professional Accountants in Business, International Federation
of Accountants, New York, NY.

IFAC (2011), Sustainability Framework 2.0, Professional Accountants in Business, International
Federation of Accountants, New York, NY.

IFAC (2015), Accounting for Sustainability, From Sustainability to Business Resilience, Professional
Accountants in Business, International Federation of Accountants, New York, NY.

IFAC (2017), “About IFAC”, available at: www.ifac.org/about-ifac (accessed 18 June 2017).

Jahn, T., Bergmann, M. and Keil, F. (2012), “Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and
marginalization”, Ecological Economics, Vol. 79, pp. 1-10.

Jasch, C. (2003), “The use of Environmental Management Accounting (EMA) for identifying
environmental costs”, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 667-676.

Kieser, A. and Leiner, L. (2009), “Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is
unbridgeable”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 46 No. 3, pp. 516-533.

Knights, D. and Scarbrough, H. (2010), “In search of relevance: perspectives on the contribution of
academic—practitioner networks”, Organization Studies, Vol. 31 Nos 9/10, pp. 1287-1309.

Lang, D.J., Wiek, A., Bergmann, M., Stauffacher, M., Martens, P., Moll, P., Swilling, M. and Thomas, C.J.
(2012), “Transdisciplinary research in sustainability science: practice, principles, and
challenges”, Sustainability Science, Vol. 7 No. S1, pp. 25-43.

Laughlin, R. (2011), “Accounting research, policy and practice: worlds together or worlds apart?”,
Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia Academic Leadership Series, Vol. 2, pp. 21-30.

Medvetz, T. (2012), “Murky power: think tanks as boundary organizations”, Rethinking Power in
Organizations, Institutions, and Markets, Emerald Publishing Limited, Bingley, pp. 113-133.

Parker, L.D. (2005), “Social and environmental accountability research: a view from the commentary
box”, Accounting, Auditing& Accountability Journal, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 842-860.

Peterson, H. (2009), “Transformational supply chains and the ‘wicked problem’ of sustainability:
aligning knowledge, innovation, entrepreneurship, and leadership”, Journal of Chain and
Network Science, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 71-82.

Porto G omez, I., Otegi Olaso, J.R. and Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J.M. (2016), “Trust builders as open
innovation intermediaries”, Innovation, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 145-163.

Roper, L. (2002), “Achieving successful academic-practitioner research collaborations”, Development in
Practice, Vol. 12 Nos 3/4, pp. 338-345.

Schaltegger, S. and Burritt, R.L. (2010), “Sustainability accounting for companies: catchphrase or
decision support for business leaders?”, Journal ofWorld Business, Vol. 45 No. 4, pp. 375-384.

Schaltegger, S. and Wagner, M. (2006), “Managing sustainability performance measurement and
reporting in an integrated manner: sustainability accounting as the link between the sustainability balanced scorecard and sustainability reporting”, in Schaltegger, S., Bennett, M.
and Burritt, R.. (Eds), Sustainability Accounting and Reporting, Springer, pp. 681-697.

Schaltegger, S., Beckmann, M. and Hansen, E.G. (2013), “Transdisciplinarity in corporate
sustainability: mapping the field”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 22 No. 4,
pp. 219-229.

Schotter, A.P., Mudambi, R., Doz, Y.L. and Gaur, A. (2017), “Boundary spanning in global
organizations”, Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 54 No. 4, pp. 403-421.
Shaw, J., Danese, C. and Stocker, L. (2013), “Spanning the boundary between climate science and coastal
communities: Opportunities and challenges”, Ocean& Coastal Management, Vol. 86, pp. 80-87.

Shrivastava, P., Ivanaj, S. and Persson, S. (2013), “Transdisciplinary study of sustainable enterprise”,
Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 230-244.

Tingey-Holyoak, J. and Burritt, R. (2012), “The transdisciplinary nature of accounting: a pathway
towards the sustainable future of the profession”, Institute of Chartered Accountants in
Australia Academic Leadership Series, Vol. 3, pp. 93-103.

Tucker, B.P. and Schaltegger, S. (2016), “Comparing the research-practice gap in management
accounting: a view from professional accounting bodies in Australia and Germany”, Accounting,
Auditing& Accountability Journal, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 362-400.

Uiterkamp, A.J.M.S. and Vlek, C. (2007), “Practice and outcomes of multidisciplinary research for
environmental sustainability”, Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 63 No. 1, pp. 175-197.

US EPA (1995), Introduction to Environmental Accounting, United States Environmental Protection
Agency, Washington, DC.

WBCSD (2016), Assurance: Generating Value from External Assurance of Sustainability Reporting:
Business Solutions for a Sustainable World, February, World Business Council for Sustainable
Development, Geneva.

WBCSD (2017a), “About us”, available at: www.wbcsd.org/Overview/About-us (accessed 18 June 2017).

WBCSD (2017b), WBCSD Leadership Program 2017: Making Sustainable Development Relevant,
Actionable and Scalable, World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Geneva.
Webb, A. (1991), “Coordination: a problem in public sector management”, Policy& Politics, Vol. 19 No. 4,
pp. 229-242.

Williams, P. (2002), “The competent boundary spanner”, Public Administration, Vol. 80 No. 1,
pp. 103-124.
World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD) and Environmental and Sustainability

Management Accounting Network (EMAN) (2016), “Measuring sustainability performance:
bridging corporate and academic contributions”, International Sustainability Accounting
Symposium2015, Geneva.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Slaughtered and the Survivors: Collaboration Between Social Economy Organizations as a Key to Success in Times of Financial Crisis

CITATION López-Arceiz, F., Bellostas, A., & Rivera-Torres, M. (2017). The Slaughtered and the Survivors: Collaboration Between Social ...