Li, L. (2017) Social Class, Social
Capital and Residential Mobility in China, Social Indicators Research,
132(3), pp.1117-1129
For library access / research help in a similar topic: anyangoceline19@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
To understand the influence of social capital (the size of local supportive
networks and generalized trust) in facilitating success across societies varying in residential
mobility, the data of 16,253 participants from 29 provinces/municipalities in China
were examined. For the role of local supportive networks, the results showed that people
with more social capital were better off (in terms of current income, social mobility from
5 years ago and social mobility from teenage) than those with less social capital in more
residentially mobile societies whereas social capital was a weaker predictor of success in
less residentially mobile societies. For generalized trust, the results showed that the positive
role of generalized trust in promoting success was less sensitive to the influence of
societal residential mobility. These findings suggest that expansion of local supportive
networks may be more important in facilitating success in more residentially mobile
societies than in less residentially mobile societies.
REFERENCES
Baumeister,R. F.,&Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong:Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental
human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497–529. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for
the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
Brissett, I., Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (2002). The role of optimism in social network development,
coping, and psychological adjustment during a life transition. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 82, 102–111. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.102.
Center for Social Science Survey. (2012). China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (CLDS). Retrieved from
http://css.sysu.edu.cn.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94,
S95–S120.
Cornwell, B. (2009). Good health and the bridging of structural holes. Social Networks, 31, 92–103.
Delhey, J., & Newton, K. (2003). Who trusts? The origins of social trust in seven societies. European
Societies, 5, 93–137. doi:10.1080/1461669032000072256.
Fatima, M., & Shafique, M. (2015). Health and academic performance of university students: Direct and
mediating effect of social capital. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 9, 357–379.
Garson, D. G. (2012). Hierarchical linear modeling: guide and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Gillath, O., & Keefer, L. A. (2016). Generalizing disposability: Residential mobility and the willingness to
dissolve social ties. Personal Relationships. doi:10.1111/pere.12119.
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380.
Li, L. M. W., Hamamura, T., & Adams, G. (2015). Relational mobility increases social (but not other) risk
propensity. Journal of Behavoiral Decision Making. doi:10.1002/bdm.1894.
Lun, J., Roth, D., Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2012). Residential mobility, social support concerns, and
friendship strategy. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4, 332–339. doi:10.1177/
1948550612453345.
Manski, C. F. (2000). Economic analysis of social interactions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14,
115–136.
Oishi, S. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility: Implications for the self, social relationships, and
well-being. Psychological Science, 5, 5–21. doi:10.1177/1745691609356781.
Oishi, S., & Kesebir, S. (2012). Optimal social-networking strategy is a function of socioeconomic conditions.
Psychological Science, 23, 1542–1548. doi:10.1177/0956797612446708.
Oishi, S., Kesebir, S., Miao, F. F., Talhelm, T., Endo, Y., Uchida, Y., et al. (2013). Residential mobility
increases motivation to expand social network: But why? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,
49, 217–223. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2012.10.008.
Oishi, S., & Schimmack, U. (2010). Residential mobility, well-being, and mortality. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 98, 980–994. doi:10.1037/a0019389.
Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment.
American Journal of Sociology, 105, 88–127. doi:10.1086/210268.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon
and Schuster.
Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6 for Windows [Computer software].
Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
Reis, H. T., Collins, W. A., & Berscheid, E. (2000). The relationship context of human behavior and
development. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 844–872. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.6.844.
Sandefur, R. L., & Laumann, E. O. (1998). A paradigm for social capital. Relationality and Society, 10,
481–501. doi:10.1177/104346398010004005.
Schug, J., Yuki, M., & Maddux, W. (2010). Relational mobility explains between- and within-culture
differences in self-disclosure to close friends. Psychological Science, 21, 1471–1478. doi:10.1177/
0956797610382786.
Szabolcs, K. (2011). Solitary minds and social capital: Latent inhibition, general intellectual functions and
social network size predict creative achievements. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5,
215–221. doi:10.1037/a0022000.
United Nations Population Division. (2009). International migration report 2009: A global assessment. New
York, NY: United Nations.
Wang, X., & Kanungo, R. N. (2004). Nationality, social network and psychological well-being: Expatriates
in China. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 15, 775–793.
Yamaguchi, A. (2013). Impact of social capital on the psychological well-being of adolescents. International
Journal of Psychological Studies, 5, 100–190.
No comments:
Post a Comment