Monday, September 30, 2019

Self-Organisation Perspective to Responsible Innovation in Industry

CITATION
Čeičytė, J., & Petraitė, M. (2017). Self-Organisation Perspective to Responsible Innovation in Industry. Organizacijø Vadyba: Sisteminiai Tyrimai78(1), 21–32.

For library access / research help in a similar topic: anyangoceline19@gmail.com 


ABSTRACT
Based on scientific literature analysis, the article examines the complex nature of the responsible innovation
concept and provides the conceptual integration of a self-organisation perspective into the concept of
responsible innovation within industry. Self-organisation characteristics are presented and argued as useful
constructs for a better understanding of responsible innovation processes.


REFERENCES
1. Allen, P. M., Lesser, M. (1991). Evolutionary
Human Systems: Learning, Ignorance and Subjectivity
// In Evolutionary Theories of Economic
and Technological Change, eds. P. P. Saviotti,
J. S. Metcalfe. - Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers,
p. 160–171.

2. Armstrong, M., Cornut, G., Delacôte, S., Lenglet,
M., Millo, Y., Muniesa, F., Tadjeddine, Y.
(2012). Towards a Practical Approach to Responsible
Innovation in Finance: New Product
Committees Revisited // Journal of Financial
Regulation and Compliance. Vol. 20, No. 2,
p. 147–168. doi: 10.1108/13581981211218289.

3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New
Modernity. - Sage.

4. Berkhout, F. (2014). Sustainable Innovation
Management. Innovation and Sustainability //
In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management,
ed. M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, N. Phillips.
- Oxford: University Press, p. 290–315.

5. Biggiero, L. (2001). Self‐organizing Processes in
Building Entrepreneurial Networks: A Theoretical
and Empirical Investigation // Human Systems
Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, p. 209–222.

6. Blok, V., Hoffmans, L., Wubben, E. F. M. (2015).
Stakeholder Engagement for Responsible Innovation
in the Private Sector: Critical Issues and
Management Practices // Journal on Chain and
Network Science. Vol. 15, No. 2, p. 147–164.
doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x003.

7. Blok, V., Lemmens, P. (2015). The Emerging
Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three
Reasons why it is Questionable and Calls for a
Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation
/ In Responsible Innovation Vol. 2,
p. 19–35. Springer International Publishing.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17308-5_2.

8. Scholten, V. E., Blok, V. (2015). Foreword: Responsible
Innovation in the Private Sector //
Journal on Chain and Network Science, Vol. 15,
No. 2, p. 101–105. doi: 10.3920/JCNS2015.x006.

9. Buenstorf, G. (2000). Self-organization and Sustainability:
Energetics of Evolution and Implications
for Ecological Economics // Ecological
Economics, Vol. 33 No. 1, p. 119–134.

10. Burget, M., Bardone, E., Pedaste, M. (2017).
Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible
Research and Innovation: A Literature
Review // Science and engineering ethics,
Vol. 23, No. 1, p. 1–19.

11. Cagnin, C., Amanatidou, E., Keenan, M. (2012).
Orienting European Innovation Systems towards
Grand Challenges and the Roles that FTA
can Play // Science and public policy, Vol. 39,
No. 2, p. 140–152. doi:10.1093/scipol/scs014.

12. Castells, M. (2011). The Rise of the Network Society.
The Information Age: Economy, Society,
and Culture (Vol. 1). - John Wiley & Sons.

13. Čeičytė, J., Petraitė, M. (2014). Atsakingųjų
inovacijų koncepcija // Viešoji politika ir
administravimas. T. 13, Nr. 3, p. 400–413.
doi: 10.5755/j01.ppaa.13.3.8302.

14. Chiles, T. H., Meyer, A. D., Hench, T. J. (2004).
Organizational emergence: The origin and
transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical
theaters // Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 5,
p. 499–519.

15. Dodgson, M., Gann, D. M., Phillips, N.
(2014). Perspectives on Innovation Management
/ The Oxford Handbook of Innovation
Manage-ment. - Oxford: University Press,
p. 3–25.

16. European Commission (2008). European Cmmissions
Code of Conduct for Responsible
Nanotechnologies Research. Internet access:
<http://ec.europa.eu/nanotechnology/pdf/
nanocode-rec_pe0894c_en.pdf> [accessed September
3, 2017].

17. European Commission (2011). DG Research
Workshop on Responsible Research and Innovation
in Europe. Internet access: <http://
ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/
document_library/pdf_06/responsibleresearch-
and-innovation-workshop-newsletter_
en.pdf> [accessed September 3, 2017].

18. European Commission (2012). Responsible
Research and Innovation: Europe’s Ability to
Respond to Societal Challenges. Internet access:
<https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/
pub_rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf> [accessed September
3, 2017].

19. Grumadaitė, K., Jucevičius, G. (2017). Preconditions
for Emergence of Lithuanian Clusters:
From Informal Cooperation to Its Legitimation
// Management of Organizations: Systematic
Research, Vol. 77, No. 1, p. 37–56. doi:
10.1515/mosr-2017-0003.

20. Grunwald, A. (2014). Technology Assessment
for Responsible Innovation. In Responsible Innovation
1, p. 15–31. - Springer Netherlands.

21. Hellstrom, T. (2003). Systematic Innovation and
Risk: Technology Assessment and the Challenge
of Responsible Innovation // Technology in Society.
Vol. 25, p. 369–384. doi: 10.1016/S0160-
791X(03)00041-1.

22. Lubberink, R., Blok, V., van Ophem, J.,
Omta, O. (2017). Lessons for Responsible Innovation
in the Business Context: A Systematic
Literature Review of Responsible, Social and
Sustainable Innovation Practices // Sustainability,
Vol. 9, No. 5.

23. Lund Declaration (2009). Konferencija: Nauji
pasauliai – naujos išeitys. Moksliniai tyrimai ir
inovacijos kaip pagrindas Europos vystymuisi
globaliame kontekste. Lundas, Švedija, 7–8 Liepa,
2009. Internet access: <http://www.se2009.
eu/polopoly_fs/1.8460!menu/standard/file/
lund_declaration_final_version_9_july.pdf>
[accessed September 15, 2017].

24. McKelvey, B. (2001). What is Complexity Science?
It is Really Order-Creation Science //
Emergence, A Journal of Complexity Issues in
Organizations and Management. Vol. 3, No. 1,
p. 137–157.

25. Owen, R. (2009). A New Era of Responsible
Innovation. Internet access: <http://
planetear th.nerc.ac.uk/features/story.
aspx?id=460&cookieConsent=A> [accessed
September 10, 2017].

26. Owen, R., Bessant, J., Heintz, M. (2013). Responsible
Innovation: Managing the Responsible
Emergence of Science and Innovation in
Society. - John Wiley & Sons.

27. Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible
Research and Innovation: From Science
in Society to Science for Society, with Society
// Science and Public Policy. Vol. 39, No. 6,
p. 751–760. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scs093.

28. Palm, E., Hansson, S. O. (2006). The Case
for Ethical Technology Assessment (eTA) //
Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Vol. 73, No. 5, p. 543–558. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.
2005.06.002.

29. Pandza, K., Ellwood, P. (2013). Strategic and Ethical
Foundations for Responsible Innovation //
Research Policy. Vol. 42, No. 5, p. 1112–1125.
doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007.

30. Pavie, X. (2012). The Importance of Responsible-
Innovation and the Necessity of “Innovation-
Care”. Internet access: <http://papers.ssrn.
com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2330132>
[accessed September 10, 2017].

31. Pavie, X., Carthy, D. (2013). An Integration
of Responsible Innovation in the Financial
Sector through Design Thinking. Internet
access: <http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/
docs/00/92/14/28/PDF/WP1324.pdf> [accessed
September 15, 2017].

32. Pavie, X., Scholten, V., Carthy, D. (2014). Responsible
Innovation: From Concept to Practice.
Singapore: - World Scientific Publishing Co.

33. Petraite, M., Pavie, X., Ceicyte, J., Janiunaite,
B., Carthy, D. (2017). Managing Innovation in
Multicultural Environments: An Imperative
of Responsibility Within Interorganizational
Networks. In Intercultural Interactions in the
Multicultural Workplace, p. 137–154. - Springer
International Publishing.

34. Plowman, D. A., Solansky, S., Beck, T. E.,
Baker, L., Kulkarni, M., Travis, D. V. (2007). The
role of leadership in emergent, self-organization
// The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 4,
p. 341–356.

35. Pyka, A., Windrum, P. (2003). The Self-Organisation
of Strategic Alliances // Economics of
innovation and new technology, Vol. 12, No. 3,
p. 245-268. doi: 10.1080/10438590290025561.

36. Rittel, H. W. M, Weber (1973). Dilemmas in a
General Theory of Planning // Policy Sciences,
Vol. 4.

37. Rycroft, R. W., Kash, D. E. (2004). Self-organizing
innovation networks: implications for
globalization // Technovation, Vol. 24, No. 3,
p. 187–197.

38. Stahl, B. C. (2013). Responsible Research and
Innovation: The Role of Privacy in an Emerging
Framework. Internet access: <http://spp.oxfordjournals.
org/content/early/2013/09/19/scipol.
sct067.full.pdf+html> [accessed September 10,
2017].

39. Stahl, B. C., McBride, N., Wakunuma, K., Flick,
C. (2013). The Empathic Robot: A Prototipe
of Responsible Research and Innovation. Internet
access: <https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/261563960_The_empathic_care_
robot_A_prototype_of_responsible_research_
and_innovation> [accessed September 10,
2017].

40. Stilgoe, J. (2013). Foreword: Why Responsible
Innovation? / In R. Owen, J. Bessant, M. Heintz
(ed.), Responsible Innovation: Managing the
Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation
in Society. - John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.

41. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing
a Framework for Responsible Innovation.
Internet access: <http://www.sciencedirect.
com/science/article/pii/S0048733313000930>
[accessed September 10, 2017].

42. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., McKelvey, B. (2007).
Complexity Leadership Theory: Shifting Leadership
from the Industrial Age to the Knowledge
Era // The Leadership Quarterly. Vol. 18, No. 4,
p. 298–318. doi 10.1016/j.leaqua.2007.04.002.

43. Van den Hoven, J. (2013). Value Sensitive Design
and Responsible Innovation. / In R. Owen,
J. Bessant, M. Heintz (ed.), Responsible Innovation:
Managing the Responsible Emergence of
Science and Innovation in Society. - John Wiley
and Sons, Ltd.

44. Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A Vision of Responsible
Innovation. Internet access: <https://europa.
eu/sinapse/sinapse/index.cfm?&fuseaction=lib.
attachment&lib_id=B98F4473-BB94-B4A9-
3B6749A0CC445DFA&attach=LIB_DOC_
EN> [accessed September 10, 2017].

45. Witt, U. (1998). Imagination and leadership–the
neglected dimension of an evolutionary theory
of the firm // Journal of Economic Behavior and
Organization, Vol. 35, No. 2, p. 161–177.

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Slaughtered and the Survivors: Collaboration Between Social Economy Organizations as a Key to Success in Times of Financial Crisis

CITATION López-Arceiz, F., Bellostas, A., & Rivera-Torres, M. (2017). The Slaughtered and the Survivors: Collaboration Between Social ...