Monday, September 16, 2019

Research Methodology in Global Strategy Research

CITATION

CuervoCazurra, A., Mudambi, R., Pedersen, T. and Piscitello, L. (2017). Research methodology in global strategy research. Global Strategy Journal7(3), pp.233-240



Research summary: We review advances in research methodology used in global
strategy research and provide suggestions on how researchers can improve their analyses
and arguments. Methodological advances in the extraction of information, such
as computer-aided text analysis, and in the analysis of datasets, such as differences-indifferences
and propensity score matching, have helped deal with challenges
(e.g., endogeneity and causality) that bedeviled earlier studies and resulted in
conflicting findings. These methodological advances need to be considered as tools that
complement theoretical arguments and well-explained logics and mechanisms so that
researchers can provide better and more relevant recommendations to managers
designing the global strategies of their organizations.

Managerial summary: We review advances in research methodology used in global
strategy research and provide suggestions for improving researchers’ analyses and arguments.
Methodological advances in the extraction of information and in the analysis of
datasets have helped researchers deal with challenges that bedeviled earlier studies and
resulted in conflicting findings. These advances have provided researchers with the ability
to obtain valid, unbiased results with clear and relevant managerial implications. Such
methodological advances need to be considered as tools that complement theoretical
arguments and well-explained logics and mechanisms so that researchers can provide
better and more relevant recommendations to managers designing the global strategies of
their organizations.


Researching on a similar topic? Get research help: anyangoceline19@gmail.com


REFERENCES
Alcácer, J., & Chung, W. (2007). Location strategies and
knowledge spillovers. Management Science, 53(5),
760–776.

Almeida, G. (2013). Applying random coefficient models
to strategy research: Testing for firm heterogeneity,
predicting firm-specific coefficients, and estimating
strategy trade-offs (Harvard Business School Working
Paper 14–022). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

Basile, R., Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2008). Location
choices of multinational firms in Europe: The role of
EU cohesion policy. Journal of International Economics,
74, 328–340.

Belderbos, R., Grabowska, M., Leten, B., Kelchtermans,
S., & Ugur, N. (2017). On the use of computer-aided
text analysis in international business research. Global
Strategy Journal, 7(3),

Belderbos, R., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2005). Competitive drivers
and international plant configuration strategies: A
product level test. Strategic Management Journal,
26(6), 577–593.

Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How
much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates?
Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.

Bowen, H. P., & Sleuwagen, L. (2017). Are international
and product diversification substitutes or complements?
Theoretical and empirical perspectives. Global Strategy
Journal, 7(3),

Branikas, I., Hong, H., & Xu J. (2017). Location choice, portfolio
choice (NBER Working Paper 23040). Cambridge,
MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

Cantwell, J. A., & Piscitello, L. (2000). Accumulating
technological competence–its changing impact on corporate
diversification and internationalisation. Industrial
and Corporate Change, 9(1), 21–51.

Castellani, D., Mariotti, I., & Piscitello, L. (2008). The impact
of outward investments on parent company’s employment
and skill composition: Evidence from the Italian case.
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 19, 81–94.

Caves, R. E. (1980). Industrial organization, corporate strategy
and structure. Journal of Economic Literature, 18(1), 64–92.

Chang, S.-J., & Chung, J. (2017). A quasi-experimental
approach to the multinationality-performance relationship:
An application to learning-by-exporting. Global Strategy
Journal, 7(3), this issue.

Coombs, J., Mudambi, R., & Deeds, D. L. (2006). An
examination of the investments in U.S. biotechnology
firms by foreign and domestic partners. Journal of Business
Venturing, 21(4), 405–428.

Cuervo-Cazurra, A. (2008). The effectiveness of laws
against bribery abroad. Journal of International Business
Studies, 39(4), 634–651.

Dahl, G. B. (2002). Mobility and the return to education:
Testing a Roy model with multiple market. Econometrica,
70(6), 2367–2420.

Harris Interactive. (2010). Survey of hand washing behavior
(trended): Prepared for the American Microbiology
Society and the American Cleaning Institute. Retrieved
from http://www.cleaninginstitute.org/assets/1/AssetMa
nager/2010%20Hand%20Washing%20Findings.pdf

Hennart, J., & Park, Y.-R. (1993). Greenfield vs. acquisition:
The strategy of Japanese investors in the United
States. Management Science, 39(9), 1054–1070.

Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2005).
Applied discrete choice analysis. New York: Cambridge
University Press.

Hitt, M., Hoskission, R., & Kim, H. (1997). International
diversification: Effects on innovation and firm performance
in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management
Journal, 40(4), 767–798.

Levy, H., & Samat, M. (1970). International diversification
of investment portfolios. American Economic Review,
60(4), 668–675.

Montgomery, C. (1982). The measurement of firm diversification:
Some new empirical evidence. Academy of
Management Journal, 25(2), 299–307.

Mudambi, R., & Mudambi, S. (2002). Diversification and
market entry choices in the context of foreign direct
investment. International Business Review, 11(1),
35–55.

Peterson, M. F., Arregle, J.-L., & Martin, X. (2012). Multilevel
models in international business research. Journal
of International Business Studies, 43, 451–457.

Piscitello, L. (2011). Strategy, location, and the conceptual
metamorphosis of the MNE. Global Strategy Journal,
1(1/2), 127–131.

Rugman, A. (1979). International diversification and multinational
enterprise. Lexington MA: Lexington Books.

Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Diversification strategy and profitability.
Strategic Management Journal, 3(4), 359–369.

Schmidheiny, K., & Brülhart, M. (2011). On the equivalence
of location choice models: Conditional logit, nested logit
and Poisson. Journal of Urban Economics, 69(2), 214–222.

Shaver, J. M., & Flyer, F. (2000). Agglomeration economies,
firm heterogeneity, and foreign direct investment
in the United States. Strategic Management Journal,
21(12), 1175–1193.

Silberzahn, R., & Uhlmann, E. L. (2015). Crowdsourced
research: Many hands make tight work. Nature, October
7. Retrieved from http://www.nature.com/news/crowd
sourced-research-many-hands-make-tight-work-1.18508
Tallman, S., & Li, J. (1996). Effects of international diversity
and product diversity on the performance of multinational
firms. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 179–196.

Tallman, S., & Pedersen, T. (2012). Point-counterpoint on
Multinationalization and performance. Global Strategy
Journal, 2(4), 313–317.

Wu, Z., Salomon, R., & Martin, X. (2017). Complex strategic
choices: A new approach with an application to
adaptive agglomeration strategies among foreign
entrants. Global Strategy Journal, 7(3),

No comments:

Post a Comment

The Slaughtered and the Survivors: Collaboration Between Social Economy Organizations as a Key to Success in Times of Financial Crisis

CITATION López-Arceiz, F., Bellostas, A., & Rivera-Torres, M. (2017). The Slaughtered and the Survivors: Collaboration Between Social ...