Barg, K. (2015) Educational Choice and
Cultural Capital: Examining Social Stratification within an Institutionalized
Dialogue between Family and School, Sociology:
the Journal of the British Sociological Association, 49(6), p.1113
For library access / research help in a similar topic: anyangoceline19@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
This article analyses the impact of social class on families’ and teachers’ decision-making
within an institutionalized family–school dialogue in France. The dialogue decides which upper
secondary school track a student will attend and consists of three main steps: (1) family’s
school track request; (2) staff meeting’s subsequent school track proposition; and (3) family’s
optional rejection of the staff’s proposition. Using national longitudinal data, I find that parents’
cultural capital importantly mediates secondary effects (i.e. social class effects that remain
after controlling for school performance) on families’ requests and their rejections of staffs’
propositions. Social class effects on staffs’ propositions are accounted for by families’ requests
and student school performance. Moreover families and teachers appear to choose grade
retention to avoid enrolment in a lower track.
REFERENCES
Barg K (2013) The influence of students’ social background and parental involvement on teachers’
school track choices: Reasons and consequences. European Sociological Review 29(3):
565–579.
Becker R and Hecken AE (2009) Higher education or vocational training? An empirical test of
the Rational Action Model of Educational Choices suggested by Breen and Goldthorpe and
Esser. Acta Sociologica 52(1): 25–45.
Bénabou R, Kramarz F and Prost C (2009) The French zones d’éducation prioritaire: Much ado
about nothing? Economics of Education Review 28(3): 345–356.
Boudon R (1974) Education, Opportunity, and Social Inequality: Changing Prospects in Western
Societies. New York: Wiley.
Bourdieu P (1966) L’école conservatrice. Les inégalités devant l’école et devant la culture. Revue
Française de Sociologie 7: 325–347.
Bowles S and Gintis H (1976) Schooling in Capitalist America. New York: Basic Books.
Brauns H (1998) Bildung in Frankreich: eine Studie zum Wandel herkunfts- und geschlechtsspezifischen
Bildungsverhaltens. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.
Brauns H and Steinmann S (1999) Educational reform in France, West-Germany and the
United Kingdom: Updating the CASMIN Educational Classification. ZUMA Nachrichten
23: 7–44.
Breen R and Goldthorpe JH (1997) Explaining educational differentials: Towards a formal rational
action theory. Rationality and Society 9(3): 275–305.
Cheadle JE and Amato PR (2011) A quantitative assessment of Lareau’s qualitative conclusions
about class, race, and parenting. Journal of Family Issues 32(5): 679–706.
DEPP (Direction de l’évaluation, de la prospective et de la performance) (2008) Suivi des élèves du
Panel 1995 au cours de leurs études secondaires: Fichier historique 1995–2006. Présentation
du panel et documentation. Paris: INSEE.
Dollmann J (2011) Verbindliche und unverbindliche Grundschulempfehlungen und soziale
Ungleichheiten am ersten Bildungsübergang. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie
63(4): 431–457.
Duru-Bellat M (1996) Social inequalities in French secondary schools: From figures to theories.
British Journal of Sociology of Education 17(3): 341–350.
Duru-Bellat M and Kieffer A (2001) The democratization of education in France: Controversy
over a topical issue. Population: An English Selection 13(2): 189–218.
Duru-Bellat M and Mingat A (1989) How do French junior secondary schools operate? Academic
achievement, grading and streaming of students. European Sociological Review 5(1): 47–64.
Duru-Bellat M, Jarousse J-P and Mingat A (1993) Les scolarités de la maternelle au lycée: Étapes
et processus dans la production des inégalités sociales. Revue Française de Sociologie 34(1):
43–60.
Erikson R and Goldthorpe JH (1992) The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial
Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Erikson R and Jonsson JO (1996) Explaining class inequality in education: The Swedish test case.
In: Erikson R and Jonsson JO (eds) Can Education Be Equalized? The Swedish Case in
Comparative Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Esser H (1999) Soziologie. Spezielle Grundlagen 1: Situationslogik und Handeln. Frankfurt a.M.:
Campus.
Horvat EM, Weininger E and Lareau A (2003) From social ties to social capital: Class difference
in the relations between school and parent networks. American Educational Research Journal
40(2): 319–351.
Ichou M and Vallet L-A (2011) Do all roads lead to inequality? Trends in French upper secondary
school analysed with four longitudinal surveys. Oxford Review of Education 37(2): 167–194.
Ichou M and Vallet L-A (2013) Academic achievement, tracking decisions and their relative
contribution to educational inequalities: Change over four decades in France. In: Jackson
M (ed.) Determined to Succeed? Performance versus Choice in Educational Attainment.
Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Jimerson SR, Pletcher SMW, Graydon K, et al. (2006) Beyond grade retention and social promotion:
Promoting the social and academic competence of students. Psychology in the Schools 43(1):
85–97.
Karlson KB and Holm A (2011) Decomposing primary and secondary effects: A new decomposition
method. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 29(2): 221–237.
Kloosterman R and De Graaf PM (2010) Non-promotion or enrolment in a lower track? The
influence of social background on choices in secondary education for three cohorts of Dutch
pupils. Oxford Review of Education 36(3): 363–384.
Lareau A and Weininger E (2003) Cultural capital in educational research: A critical assessment.
Theory and Society 32(5/6): 567–606.
Long JS (1997) Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Long JS and Freese J (2014) Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata,
Third Edition. College Station, TX: Stata Press.
Masson P (1994) Négociations et conflits dans le processus d’orientation des élèves de
l’enseignement secondaire. Sociétés contemporaines 18–19: 165–186.
Masson P (1997) Elèves, parents d’élèves et agents scolaires dans le processus d’orientation.
Revue Française de Sociologie 38(1): 119–142.
Mood C (2010) Logistic regression: Why we cannot do what we think we can do, and what we can
do about it. European Sociological Review 26(1): 67–82.
Neugebauer M (2010) Bildungsungleichheit und Grundschulempfehlung beim Übergang auf das
Gymnasium: Eine Dekomposition primärer und sekundärer Herkunftseffekte. Zeitschrift für
Soziologie 39(3): 202–214.
OECD (1996) Education at a Glance: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
Roux S and Davaillon A (2001) Le processus d’orientation en fin de troisième: Observation des
comportements des acteurs et analyse des causalités. Éducation et Formations 60: 41–53.
Ryan C and Watson L (2006) Why does year twelve retention differ between Australian states and
territories? Australian Journal of Education 50(2): 203–219.
Schnurr BL, Kundert DK and Nickerson AB (2009) Grade retention: Current decision-making
practices and involvement of school psychologists working in public schools. Psychology in
the Schools 46(5): 410–419.
Stocké V (2007) Explaining educational decision and effects of families’ social class position:
An empirical test of the Breen-Goldthorpe Model of Educational Attainment. European
Sociological Review 23(4): 505–519.
Williams R (2012) Using margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and
marginal effects. Stata Journal 12(2): 308–331.
No comments:
Post a Comment